Voting is a Fraud….

-The Fraud of voting

The fraud of voting, thinking that this will lead to change, is that the electable candidates are simply a joke. First, they are inside the system and the system only tolerates those that are compliant to the wishes of the true “Power behind the Throne”. Outsiders don’t stand a chance. This was demonstrated when reviewing the spectacular line-up for the Primary showdown. With a couple of exceptions, they resembled something similar to Monty Python’s “Ministry of Silly Walks”. The system is flawed from the start, because through “representative democracy” the candidate become susceptible to the influence of the “elites” and seldom consult ordinary citizens, so even though they are elected, a truly representative government doesn’t really exist. There is clear evidence that todays democratic governments worldwide tend to bow to the wishes of corporations than to those of the People. And the Candidate that kowtow’s to these wishes the best, stands a wonderful chance of getting elected through media propaganda and influential endorsement.

For anyone willing to spend a few minutes in researching the financial backers of the most eligible election candidates, there is clear evidence that powerful elitists exert tremendous leverage on those that they have hand chosen.

For example, a few of the largest donors to Clinton’s campaign include long time supporters Haim and Cheryl Saban, with a whopping  $10 million in contributions. Haim Saban is a dual Israeli/American  media and investment mogul with a net worth of approximately $3 billion. The Saban’s also co-hosted a fundraiser for Clinton this past April along with George and Amal Clooney. Tickets started at $33,400 a person. An interview with “The New Yorker” on May10, 2010, clearly states what Mr. Saban’s priorities are:

“He remains keenly interested in the world of business, but he is most proud of his role as political power broker. His greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel, by strengthening the United States-Israel relationship. At a conference last fall in Israel, Saban described his formula. His “three ways to be influential in American politics,” he said, were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets. In 2002, he contributed seven million dollars toward the cost of a new building for the Democratic National Committee—one of the largest known donations ever made to an American political party.”

What better way to get his desires met that to sponsor a pro-Israeli candidate such as Clinton. In fact during a speech in March at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, she said “If I’m fortunate enough to be elected president, the United States will reaffirm we have a strong and enduring national interest in Israel’s security.” And in a letter Clinton wrote to Saban in July 2015 she asked him for “recommendations on how leaders and communities across America can work together to counter BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions),” a movement aimed to pressure Israel into accommodating Palestine’s demands.

Saban also contributed to Bill Clinton’s campaign and to the Bill Clinton Foundation, that has been accused of unethical dealings. Other contributors to the Clinton campaign include James Simons, (worth $16.5B) $7 million, George Soros (worth $24.9B, categorized as an “economic war criminal”), $6.5 million and a several other billionaires, many of whom have allegiance outside is the United States. Is it then cynical to believe that when Clinton becomes President (no doubt in my mind) she will have to repay the favour to these hawks? Soros, of course, is well known for his behind the scenes manipulation and machinations. When talking about Trump at a dinner in Davos, Soros said: “By fear-mongering, he and [Ted] Cruz are doing the work of Isis…”. Based on this comment, one would presume that he, Soros, disliked Trump. Also, the controlled media is full of stories concerning the anti-Israeli stance of Soros. Strange then that he back pro-Israeli candidate Clinton and even stranger than he was involved in financing Trump in one of his business ventures. This transaction took place in 2004 when Trump needed finances to build the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Chicago. Part of the funding came from a conglomerate consisting of George Soros, Fortress Investment Group and Blackacre Capital. The amount at that time was $160 million referred to as a mezzanine loan, basically a second mortgage. The Wall Street journal estimated that, “A loan document says Mr. Trump could have to pay Fortress as much as $360 million”, once interest and duration was added. It then becomes extremely surprising that Trump was forgiven a massive part of this lone and bought it out at a highly reduced amount according to Crain’s Chicago Business, “Donald Trump has paid $48 million to buy out junior creditors on his 92-story Chicago condominium and hotel project.” Found at: –

“Donald Trump has lined up three New York hedge funds, including money from billionaire George Soros, to invest $160 million in his Chicago skyscraper, a key piece in perhaps the largest construction financing in the city’s history, according to real estate sources and public documents.”

Trump has claimed all along that he is his own major funder and this appears to be true. However, the loan that Soros made Trump was never paid in full. What then did Trump “owe” to Soros and did Soros get re-paid with a favour?

“I am self-funding my campaign and therefore I will not be controlled by the donors, special interests and lobbyists who have corrupted our politics and politicians for far too long,” Trump said in a statement on Friday. “I have disavowed all Super PAC’s, requested the return of all donations made to said PAC’s, and I am calling on all presidential candidates to do the same. The character of our country is only as strong as our leaders.” -Found at: –

When analyzing the 2016 Presidential runoff, it becomes clear that Clinton was the chosen insider from the start. The only true opposition was Bernie Sanders who offered up a tough fight. Clinton disposed of him even though he claims that he won the Primary race and that voter fraud took place. This claim is substantiated by WikiLeaks founder and editor Julian Assange in an interview with John Pilger, an Australian journalist based in the United Kingdom. Since  claims like this are prevalent and difficult to prove, we have to take Clintons win at face value. All that it took for Clinton to make it to the final round was to get 7.15% of the voting public to give her the nod. And as stated above, this number consists of 3.78% who feel that she is a fit candidate and 3.37% who voted in her favour based on their fear and hatred of Trump. Hatred that was created and manipulated by the owned media. Remember Haim Saban’s statement to The New Yorker magazine… “His “three ways to be influential in American politics,” he said, were: make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets…”. I call this a Slam-Dunk.

The next move, once all opposition was eliminated except for Trump, is/was to press the red button and unleash a barrage of allegations, slanders and incrimination on another hand pick candidate whose soul purpose is to act as the controlled (and paid for) opposition. This is not an excuse for the diabolical behaviour of a lunatic, but the suggestion that this whole event is staged as are most elections. “Freedom” to vote is the equivalent of asking someone if they would rather get Polio over Small-pox, in other words, zero choice. And voting for pre-elected, pre-screened shills, sociopaths who benefit themselves at the expense of the People is completely illogical and morally bankrupt. Today’s voting system is for people who love their servitude.

“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.” -Aldous Huxley, Brave New World